Microsoft wins $21billion deal to supply Army combat troops with its augmented reality headsets

Microsoft wins $21billion deal to supply Army combat troops with its augmented reality headsets that could boost soldiers’ awareness of their surroundings and ability to spot danger

  • Microsoft won a $21billion contract to supply US Army combat troops with its augmented reality headsets  
  • The technology is based on Microsoft’s HoloLens headsets, which were originally intended for the video game and entertainment industries
  • The Army first began testing Microsoft’s system with a $480million contract in 2018 and said the headsets could be used for both training and in actual battle 

Microsoft has won a $21billion contract to supply US Army combat troops with its augmented reality headsets.

Microsoft and the Army separately announced the deal Wednesday. The technology is based on Microsoft’s HoloLens headsets, which were originally intended for the video game and entertainment industries.

Pentagon officials have described the futuristic technology – which the Army calls its Integrated Visual Augmentation System – as a way of boosting soldiers’ awareness of their surroundings and their ability to spot targets and dangers.

Microsoft’s head-mounted HoloLens displays let people see virtual imagery superimposed over the physical world in front of them – anything from holograms in virtual game worlds to repair instructions floating over a broken gadget. 

Users can control what they see using hand gestures or voice commands.

Microsoft has won a nearly $21billion contract to supply US Army combat troops with its augmented reality headsets. Army soldiers are seen testing out Microsoft’s headsets while training 

The Army’s website says soldiers tested the gadgets last year at Fort Pickett in Virginia. It said the system could help troops gain an advantage ‘on battlefields that are increasingly urban, congested, dark and unpredictable’.

The Army first began testing Microsoft’s system with a $480million contract in 2018 and said the headsets could be used for both training and in actual battle. 

The new contract will enable Microsoft to mass produce units for more than 120,000 soldiers in the Army Close Combat Force.

Microsoft said the contract will amount to up to $21.88billion over the next decade, with a five-year base agreement that can be extended for another five years.

Microsoft President Brad Smith told the Senate Armed Services Committee in February that the system could integrate thermal night vision and facial recognition to provide soldiers with ‘real-time analytics’ on remote battlefields. 

He also described how it could help in planning a hostage rescue operation by creating a ‘digital twin’ of the building.

The Army first began testing Microsoft's system with a $480million contract in 2018

The Army has said that the headsets could be used for both training and in actual battle

The Army (left and right) first began testing Microsoft’s system with a $480million contract in 2018 and said the headsets could be used for both training and in actual battle

A group of Microsoft workers in 2019 petitioned the company to cancel its initial Army deal, arguing it would turn real-world battlefields into a video game.

Microsoft is among several tech companies that have sought to wow the gaming world with glitzy new virtual reality goggles over the past decade, though the efforts have largely fizzled. 

Microsoft pivoted away from consumer applications for its second-generation HoloLens 2, introduced in 2019, which is the basis for the Army’s new gadgets.

Although Microsoft recently demonstrated a way to use the goggles to play the hit game Pokemon Go, it mostly pitches the devices as work tools to help surgeons, factory crews and others.

The headset deal is part of Microsoft’s broader work as a defense contractor. 

The Pentagon in September reaffirmed Microsoft as winner of a cloud computing contract potentially worth $10billion, although the work has been delayed by a legal battle over rival Amazon´s claim that the bidding process was flawed.