How war crimes accusations against soldiers on overseas tours are investigated will be reviewed

How war crimes accusations against soldiers on overseas tours are investigated will be reviewed by judge

  • The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said probe will ensure guidance is ‘fit for future’
  • Is for investigating accusations against members of armed forces on foreign soil
  • Government facing controversy over Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill
  • Labour said Bill fails to protect troops from prosecutions on historical matters

A judge-led review will look into the way allegations of wrongdoing during overseas military operations are investigated, the Defence Secretary has announced. 

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the probe will ensure the guidance for investigating accusations against members of the armed forces relating to actions taken on foreign soil is ‘fit for the future’. 

The announcement comes as the Government faces controversy over its Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill which Labour has said fails to protect troops from prosecution on historical matters. 

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said: ‘Nobody wants to see service personnel subjected to drawn-out investigations, only for the allegations to prove to be false or unfounded. 

‘At the same time, credible allegations against those who fall short of our high standards must be investigated quickly and efficiently. 

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the probe will ensure the guidance for investigating accusations against members of the armed forces relating to actions taken on foreign soil is ‘fit for the future’. Pictured: Soldiers from the 1 Para Brigade progress towards a town north of Basra, Iraq

‘This review, which will run in tandem with our Overseas Operations Bill and build on the recommendations of the Service Justice System Review, will help future-proof investigations and provide greater certainty to both victims and service personnel.’  

The MoD said the review, which will be led by a retired judge, would not reconsider past investigations or prosecutorial decisions, and nor would it reopen historical cases but look instead at how ‘processes can be strengthened’. 

Labour accused the Government of using the review to divert from the criticism the Overseas Operations Bill has been receiving. 

Ministers have said the legislation will limit false and historical allegations arising from overseas operations by introducing a statutory presumption against prosecution, making it exceptional for personnel to be prosecuted five years or more after an incident. 

They hope it will end the relentless ‘vexatious’ legal probes which soldiers have faced for more than ten years after serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.  

But campaigners and some senior military figures have warned the legislation will create a presumption against prosecution of torture and other serious crimes except rape and sexual violence. 

Shadow defence secretary John Healey said: ‘It is hard to take the Defence Secretary seriously. 

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace (pictured) said: 'Nobody wants to see service personnel subjected to drawn-out investigations, only for the allegations to prove to be false or unfounded'

Defence Secretary Ben Wallace (pictured) said: ‘Nobody wants to see service personnel subjected to drawn-out investigations, only for the allegations to prove to be false or unfounded’

‘Over the last five years, the Government has done four reviews with almost 100 recommendations on armed forces investigations and prosecutions. 

‘Faced with growing criticism of their Overseas Operations Bill, the Government has launched another review rather than rethinking the legislation. 

‘Ministers should instead work with Labour, and organisations including the British Legion and Liberty, to improve the Bill so it better protects British troops and our reputation for adhering to international law.’

Last month Labour warned new laws aimed at protecting British troops from relentless legal witch-hunts would block soldiers’ own injury claims. 

Mr Healey said parts of the new bill amounted to ‘penny-pinching’ because they put a time limit on compensation claims from UK forces. 

This would mean soldiers who have suffered life-changing trauma could find it more difficult to seek compensation.  

Labour want claims from troops to be exempt from time limits induced by the Bill. 

They added it would ‘deny troops serving overseas the same employment rights as everyone they serve to defend back home’.