Ministers will let healthy over-70s be released from lockdown with the rest of the UK amid fears of ‘social unrest’.
The government is keen to clarify rules for the elderly after confusion at the weekend over the official guidance.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock denied that over-70s were being asked to stay in their homes and had a ‘blanket ban’, but information on the government’s website suggested otherwise.
The latest ONS figures show that anxiety levels have doubled during the lockdown and fuelled by the over-70s who are no longer happier than the younger generation.
The latest ONS figures show that anxiety levels have doubled during the lockdown and fuelled by the over-70s who are no longer happier than the younger generation
Baroness Ros Altmann, 64, said many healthy over-70s would risk going to prison rather than continue isolating if younger generations did not have to.
The campaigner said using age-based criteria to lift restrictions would send a message that older people’s lives ‘don’t count in the same way as others’.
Baroness Ros Altmann, 64, said many healthy over-70s would risk going to prison rather than continue isolating if younger generations did not have to
The government is currently reviewing its lockdown policy with Boris Johnson expected to unveil changes to current strategy on Sunday. Other European countries have already begun relaxing some restrictions, with millions returning to work in Italy yesterday.
A cabinet member told The Telegraph they would be ‘very surprised’ if there was any tightening of the lockdown for the over-70s.
The minister added: ‘The all over-70s grouping is going to morph. There is a big difference between the 1.5million ‘shielded’ people, known as extremely critically vulnerable, who have been sent a letter advising them to shield for 12 weeks, vulnerable people with pre-existing conditions of any age, and healthy over-70s.
‘This needs to be made clearer – you can’t just have a blanket over-70s group, that’s unsustainable.’
It comes after more than 25 million Britons experienced high anxiety in the days after lockdown measures were announced – and women are suffering more than men, a study by the Office for National Statistics said.
While both sexes have noted ‘substantially elevated’ levels of anxiety during the pandemic when compared to last year, women are finding life in lockdown harder than men, reporting higher levels of anxiety.
Levels of anxiety in the UK are far higher than usual as the lockdown remains in place, figures released by ONS reveal
The over-70’s in particular are struggling with the lockdown measures, the ONS said:
The ONS found this age group is becoming increasingly unhappy and anxious, and said: “Those aged 70 years and above reported being happier than those aged 16 to 69 years before the lockdown.
‘By the third week of lockdown, however, this gap had closed, so there was no significant difference in levels.
“The Government has advised the over-70s to be more stringent with social distancing measures and to ask friends, family and neighbours for support with essential supplies including food and medicine.
‘This could be leading to higher anxiety for this group.”
Anxiety levels are rated between 0 and 10, where 0 is ‘not at all anxious’ and 10 is ‘completely anxious’. Anxiety ratings between 0-1 are classed by the ONS as very low, 2-3 low, 4-5 medium and 6-10 high.
Among women the average anxiety rating was 5.77 out of 10 in late March, while for men it was 4.57.
The study was conducted between March 20 and 30 – which follows the closure of cafes, pubs, bars and restaurants.
The most common worries among both men and women related to work and finances, with those fearing they would be unable to save money reporting anxiety 33 per cent higher on average.
Women however reported greater levels of anxiety compared to men, with their average rating 24 per cent higher between April 3 and 13.
One possible explanation is that more women are economically inactive compared to men – 24.3 per cent compared to 15.8 per cent, respectively. In the UK, 21.8 per cent of women with dependent children are economically inactive compared to 5.2 per cent of men with dependent children.
But draft guidance seen by the Daily Mail suggested there will be no return to normality in the foreseeable future with the government telling businesses the restrictions could remain in place for up to a year.
Employers will be told to close canteens and other communal areas, with staff encouraged to eat packed lunches on their own.
Shift patterns will be staggered to limit the number of people at work at any one time and reduce rush-hour pressure on public transport. Access to communal facilities like photocopiers will be limited, areas of the floor will be taped off to keep people two metres apart and people could be barred from sitting opposite one another.
Hot desking will be banned and workers will not even be allowed to lend each other a pen for fear of spreading the virus.
As a result of the stringent measures, millions of staff will be told to keep working from home indefinitely ‘if at all possible’.
And firms have been told that ‘vulnerable’ people, including the over-70s, pregnant women and the severely obese, should work from home – even if this means finding them a new role.