Tottenham have reversed their decision to furlough non-playing staff after players expressed their fury at the club’s controversial call.
Spurs have joined Liverpool in backtracking on their original plan to use tax payers’ cash via the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme, which entitles businesses to claim from the British government 80 per cent of an employee’s monthly wage up to £2,500.
Sportsmail understands Spurs players were left angered by the club’s decision to furlough non-playing staff, as well as the move to enforce 20 per cent pay cuts to other employees.
There was a feeling within the squad that the decision reflected dismally on the club as a whole, with the hierarchy known to have been made aware of their players’ resentment.
‘In our last update we said we would keep our position under review, especially in the context of revised budgets and cost cutting,’ read a club statement.
‘Having done so we have decided that all non-playing staff, whether full-time, casual or furloughed, will receive 100 per cent of their pay for April and May. Only the Board will take salary reductions.’
Daniel Levy came in for huge criticism after Tottenham placed non-playing staff on furlough
Tottenham have now reversed their original decision amid mounting pressure from supporters
Tottenham’s decision to rely on the furloughing scheme was met with widespread condemnation within the football community given their position as one of the biggest clubs on the planet.
Tottenham declared a £69million profit last year, and their revenue of more than £460m makes them the eighth largest club in the world, according to Deloitte’s rankings. The club’s owner, Joe Lewis, is reported to be worth £4.3billion.
Indeed, Tottenham have been targeted for criticism from their own fans, but the today’s U-turn should serve to dampen some of the disquiet.
Chairman Daniel Levy added: ‘The criticism the Club has received over the last week has been felt all the more keenly because of our track record of good works and our huge sense of responsibility to care for those that rely on us, particularly locally.
‘It was never our intent, as custodians, to do anything other than put measures in place to protect jobs whilst the Club sought to continue to operate in a self-sufficient manner during uncertain times.
‘We regret any concern caused during an anxious time and hope the work our supporters will see us doing in the coming weeks, as our stadium takes on a whole new purpose, will make them proud of their Club.’
Tottenham have followed in the footsteps of Liverpool to change their original decision
Tottenham had previously been urged by fans to ‘not further damage the club’s reputation’
Spurs are in talks with their players about taking wage reductions to help soften the financial burden caused by the coronavirus crisis.
Sources last week indicated the club and their players were quite some distance from agreeing a pay deal.
But it is hoped the decision not to furlough staff will make the path towards an agreement smoother.
Meanwhile, Spurs have also confirmed equipment has been installed in their stadium to operate drive-through COVID-19 testing and swabbing for NHS staff, families and their dependents.
In a strong request on Twitter, the club’s main fan group – Tottenham Hotspur Supporters’ Trust – previously wrote: ‘We have been saying consistently @SpursOfficial – pause and rethink.
‘We are now saying it clearly and in public – do not further damage the Club’s reputation, listen to your fans.’
But after hearing Tottenham’s reversal, the supporters group claimed the decision is a ‘big step in restoring relations between fans and the club’, while admitting it takes ‘maturity and humility’ to change such a contentious decision.
The THST said in a statement: ‘It takes maturity and humility to reverse such a contentious and public decision and we’re pleased that, rather than doubling down, the club’s board has listened to the fans on this occasion and ultimately done the right thing.
‘As we said in our statement, no organisation is going to get everything right in these unprecedented circumstances and the eventual outcome is what matters.
‘We’re delighted for the club’s non-playing staff and we thank the club’s directors for finding an alternative way forward. This is the first step, but a big step, in restoring relations between fans and the club.
‘We should now focus on the range of other measures the club is delivering to help the NHS combat the COVID-19 pandemic; measures that can go a long way to making us proud of our club once more.
‘Difficult days are ahead but, with everyone playing their part, we can come through the many challenges we are all facing.’
On Monday, Jamie Redknapp slammed Levy for his original decision: ‘I just feel at times they don’t act like a big club,’ Redknapp told Sky Sports News
‘Tottenham, I know full well have good finances and plenty behind them, but it didn’t sit well with me.’
Meanwhile, his father and former Tottenham manager Harry Redknapp was also outspoken on the matter.
He told the BBC: ‘I’m a bit disappointed they’ve used that scheme to keep workers on. These people are so important to every football club, the club shouldn’t be taking the government’s money to be paying them.
‘The players need to have a meeting among themselves and from their heart, say ‘I think it would be a good idea, let us take a wage cut, not deferred wages, we can afford to take a cut, whether its five, 10 per cent, but do it from the heart.’
‘When the government brought this scheme out I thought it was for businesses who couldn’t afford to keep workers on, I didn’t think it was for the use of top Premier League clubs.’