Female lawyer who ‘sacrificed’ career to look after her children awarded £400,000 compensation

Female lawyer who ‘sacrificed’ her career to look after her children is awarded £400,000 compensation from ex-husband on top of equal share of couple’s £10m assets in divorce case

  • Mr Justice Moor gave the ruling following a private family court trial in London
  • Pair who were married for decade with two children ordered to split £10m assets
  • But woman awarded extra compensation for curtailing career for good of family

A woman who curtailed her career as a lawyer so she could look after her children has been awarded £400,000 in compensation from her estranged husband following the breakdown of their marriage.

Mr Justice Moor gave the ruling following a private family court trial in London where he decided that the pair, who were married for nearly a decade and had two children together, should split their assets of just under £10million.

But the judge added that the woman, who was educated at Cambridge University, should also be awarded £400,000 for curtailing her legal career for the good of the family. 

Mr Justice Moor (pictured) gave the ruling following a private family court trial in London where he decided that the pair, who were married for nearly a decade and had two children together, should split their assets of just under £10million

What is relationship-generated disadvantage?

Compensation for relationship-generated disadvantage is financial relief paid on divorce, nullity or judicial separation. 

It is most often applied when one party has given up a lucrative career to care for children. 

The compensation recognises that the individual may have seriously damaged their own ability to earn an independent living for the greater good of the family. 

Even if their future needs have been generously met, it may be that they are entitled to look to the other party in the relationship for a share of their surplus income to be paid by way of compensation.

He justified his decision after stating that there had been ‘relationship-generated disadvantage’ as the husband, who was also a lawyer, was still able to enjoy a ‘stellar’ career.

The couple, who live in London and are both solicitors in the 40s, cannot be identified in media reports of the case.

Lawyer Jane Keir, who is based at law firm Kingsley Napley and represented the woman, said after the ruling: ‘We are delighted to have secured a successful outcome for our client.

‘As a talented lawyer, our client sacrificed a potentially lucrative career for her family and to care of the children and we are pleased that Mr Justice Moor agreed.

‘Although Mr Justice Moor has made clear this decision should not open the floodgates to a raft of relationship generated disadvantage claims, the judgment affirms that in truly exceptional circumstances the principle of compensation still exists in family law, and rightly so.

‘In theory, this would apply to whichever partner steps back in their career putting family ahead of ambition and earning power.’ 

The case was thought to be ‘exceptional’ due to the high salaries both lawyers earned before they started a family.

The judge added that the woman, who was educated at Cambridge University (pictured), should also be awarded £400,000 for curtailing her legal career for the good of the family

The judge added that the woman, who was educated at Cambridge University (pictured), should also be awarded £400,000 for curtailing her legal career for the good of the family

Source link